cjcmedia.com

Welcome to WordPress. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start writing!

Rahmat Shah became the first Test centurion of Afghanistan because the people reached a solid place on the day of the one-off match against Bangladesh at Chittagong.
SCORECARD
Rahmat hit 102, sharing a record 120-run venture for the fourth wicket with Asghar Afghan, who remained unbeaten on 88 as his side posted.
Afghanistan initially fought after winning the toss, together with Bangladesh spinner Taijul Islam claiming his 100th Test wicket as he bamboozled Ihsanullah Janat (4) using a googly.
Taijul also eliminated debutant Ibrahim Zadran (21) and Afghanistan were 77-3 if Hashmatullah Shahidi (14) fell to Mahmudullah on the stroke of lunch.
But the pair was hard to shift and Ramat – who had missed out on a ton in the past Test of Afghanistan against Ireland – reached three figures with a late cut for four soon after tea.
But he dropped to off-spinner the following delivery, edging to slide of Nayeem Hasan, as Bangladesh fought , and Mohammad Nabi also departed for a duck.

Read more here: http://cjcmedia.com/?p=2227

As the visitors reached a strong position on the day of their one-off match against Bangladesh in Chittagong rahmat Shah became Afghanistan’s first Test centurion.
SCORECARD
Rahmat hit 102, sharing a listing 120-run venture for the fourth wicket as 271-5 was posted by his side at stumps with Asghar Afghan, who remained unbeaten on 88.
Afghanistan initially struggled after winning the toss, together with Bangladesh spinner Taijul Islam asserting his 100th Test wicket because he bamboozled Ihsanullah Janat (4) using a googly.
Taijul additionally removed debutant Ibrahim Zadran (21) and Afghanistan were 77-3 when Hashmatullah Shahidi (14) fell to Mahmudullah on the stroke of lunch.
Nevertheless, the fourth-wicket pair was hard to Ramat and change – who had narrowly missed out on a slew in the past Test of Afghanistan against Ireland – reached three figures with a late cut for four soon after tea.
He dropped to off-spinner Nayeem Hasan delivery, edging to slip, and Mohammad Nabi departed for a duck as Bangladesh fought .

Read more here: http://cjcmedia.com/?p=2227

Because the people reached a place on the first day of the match against Bangladesh in 27, rahmat Shah became Afghanistan’s first Test centurion.
SCORECARD
Rahmat struck 102, sharing a record venture for the fourth wicket because his side posted with Asghar Afghan, who remained unbeaten on 88.
Afghanistan initially fought after winning the toss, with Bangladesh spinner Taijul Islam claiming his 100th Test wicket as he bamboozled Ihsanullah Janat (4) with a googly.
Taijul also removed debutant Ibrahim Zadran (21) and Afghanistan were 77-3 if Hashmatullah Shahidi (14) dropped to Mahmudullah on the stroke of lunch.
But the fourth-wicket pair was difficult to shift and Ramat – who had narrowly missed out to a slew in Afghanistan Test against Ireland – reached three figures with a late cut four soon .
However, he dropped to off-spinner Nayeem Hasan’s next shipping, edging to slip, as Bangladesh fought back and Mohammad Nabi left for a few three balls after.

Read more here: http://cjcmedia.com/?p=2227

As the people reached a strong place on the day of the match against Bangladesh at 27, rahmat Shah became Afghanistan’s first Test centurion.
SCORECARD
Rahmat hit 102, sharing a listing venture for the fourth wicket as his side posted 271-5 in 29, with Asghar Afghan, who remained unbeaten on 88.
Afghanistan initially fought after winning the toss, together with Bangladesh spinner Taijul Islam claiming his 100th Test wicket as he bamboozled Ihsanullah Janat (4) using a googly.
Taijul additionally eliminated debutant Ibrahim Zadran (21) and Afghanistan were 77-3 when Hashmatullah Shahidi (14) fell to Mahmudullah about the stroke of lunch.
But the pair was hard to change and Ramat – who had missed out on a slew in the past Test of Afghanistan against Ireland – reached three figures with a cut four soon after tea.
He fell to off-spinner Nayeem Hasan’s next delivery, edging to slide, and Mohammad Nabi left for a duck as Bangladesh fought .

Read more here: http://cjcmedia.com/?p=2227

The 10th Amendment provides that, if the Constitution does not give a power to the federal government or accept that power away from the states, that power has been reserved for the states or the people themselves. The Supreme Court has interpreted this provision to bar the federal government from”commandeering” the countries to enforce national laws or laws. Now the justices ruled that a federal law which bars states from legalizing sports gambling violates the anti-commandeering doctrine. Their decision not only opens the door for states around the country to allow sports betting, but it also could give significantly more power to states generally, on topics which range from the decriminalization of marijuana to sanctuary cities.
The federal law at issue in the case is the skilled and Amateur Sports Protection Act, which dates back to 1992. The law, called PASPA, bans most states from (among other things) authorizing sports betting; it carved out an exception which would have permitted New Jersey to establish a sports-betting strategy in the state’s casinos, provided that the state failed within a year. But it required New Jersey 20 years to behave: In 2012, the state legislature passed a law that legalized sports gambling.
Justice Alito delivers opinion in Murphy v. NCAA (Art Lien)
The National Collegiate Athletic Association and the four major professional sports leagues went to court, arguing that the 2012 law breached PASPA. The lower federal courts agreed, prompting the New Jersey legislature to go back to the drawing board. In 2014, it passed a new law which rolled back existing bans on sports betting, at least since they applied to New Jersey casinos and racetracks. The NCAA and the championships returned into court, asserting that the law also violated PASPA, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit again ruled against the state.
The Supreme Court agreed to look at that the nation’s constitutional challenge to PASPA, and today the court reversed. In a determination by Justice Samuel Alito, the court began by describing the”anticommandeering doctrine may seem arcane, but it is simply the expression of a basic structural conclusion integrated in the Constitution” –“that the choice to withhold from Congress the power to issue orders directly to the States.” And that, the majority lasted, is exactly the issue with the provision of PASPA the state contested, which bars states from sports gambling: It”unequivocally dictates what a state legislature could and may not perform.” “It’s as if,” the majority suggested,”national officials were installed in state legislative chambers and were armed with the ability to stop legislators from voting on any offending proposals. A more direct affront to state sovereignty,” Alito concluded,”is difficult to envision.”
The court rejected the argument, created by the leagues as well as the federal government, that the PASPA provision barring states from sports betting doesn’t”commandeer” the states, but instead merely supersedes any state laws that conflict with the supply — a legal doctrine called pre-emption. Pre-emption, the majority explained,”is based on a federal law that regulates the conduct of private actors,” but here”there is simply no way to comprehend the provision forbidding state authorization as anything other than a direct control to the States,” that”is just what the anticommandeering principle does not allow.”
Having determined the PASPA provision barring states from sports betting is unconstitutional, the bulk then turned to the question which followed by that conclusion: Should the remainder of PASPA be broke down as well, or will the law survive without the anti-authorization provision? In legal terms, the query is known as”severability,” and now six of the seven justices — Alito along with Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas, Elena Kagan and Neil Gorsuch — who agreed the PASPA anti-authorization provision was unconstitutional also concurred that the whole law ought to fall. They reasoned that, if the bar on countries authorizing or licensing sports betting had been invalid, it would be”most unlikely” that Congress would have wanted to continue to prevent the states from conducting sports lotteries, which were regarded as”far more benign than other forms of gambling.” In the same way, the majority posited, if Congress had known that the pub on state authorization or operation of sports betting will be struck down, it wouldn’t have desired that the parallel ban on the operation of sports-betting strategies by private entities to continue. The PASPA provision barring the promotion of sports gambling met the same fate; otherwise, the court explained,”federal law could prohibit the promotion of an activity that is legal under both state and federal law, and that is something that Congress has seldom done.”
The majority acknowledged that the question of whether to legalize sports betting”is a contentious one” which”requires an important policy choice.” But that decision, the majority continued,”is not ours to make. Congress can control sports gambling directly, but if it elects not to do so, each State is free to act on its own.”
Justice Clarence Thomas filed a concurring opinion in which he focused not on the substance of this court’s ruling but instead on a rather subjective legal question: the viability of the court’s present severability doctrine. Thomas made clear that he joined the majority’s decision striking down most PASPA because”it gives us the ideal response it could to this query, and no party has requested us to apply another test.” But he proposed that the court ought to, at some stage later on, rethink its severability doctrine, which he characterized as”dubious.” To begin with, he observed, the doctrine is contrary to the tools that courts normally use to translate laws since it requires a “`nebulous query into hypothetical congressional purpose,”’ teaching judges to attempt to figure out exactly what Congress would have wanted to do if part of a law violated the Constitution, when”it appears improbable that the enacting Congress had any intention on this question.” Second, he continued, the philosophy”often requires courts to weigh in on statutory terms that no party has” a legal right to challenge.
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg filed a dissenting opinion. Ginsburg did not elaborate on her apparent decision (combined in total by Justice Sonia Sotomayor) which PASPA’s pub on the consent of sports betting from the nations does not violate the Constitution. Instead, she argued (also with assistance from Justice Stephen Breyer) that, even if PASPA’s anti-authorization provision is unconstitutional, the rest of the law ought to remain in force. “On no rational ground,” Ginsburg emphasized,”is it concluded that Congress would have chosen no statute at all if it could not prohibit States from authorizing or licensing these schemes.”
New Jersey has long estimated that allowing sports betting could revive the state’s struggling racetracks and casinos. In March of this year, ESPN estimated that if New Jersey were to win, the state could have legal sports gambling by the time football season kicks off in the autumn; almost two dozen other nations are also considering bills that would enable sports betting. The financial impact of allowing sports betting cannot be understated: Legal sports gambling in Las Vegas takes in over $5 billion annually, and many estimates place the value of illegal sports betting in the USA at around $100 billion.
Today’s ruling may also have a much broader reach, possibly affecting a range of topics that bear little resemblance to sports betting. For instance, supporters of so-called”sanctuary cities” — towns that refuse to cooperate with federal immigration officials to enforce immigration laws — have mentioned the 10th Amendment in late challenges to the national government’s attempts to implement states on grants for local and state law enforcement. Challenges to the federal government’s recent attempts to enforce federal marijuana laws in states that have legalized the drug for either recreational or medical use might also be based on the 10th Amendment.

Read more here: http://www.huatongfund.com.cn/2019/10/19/andy-murray-says-he-feels-competitive-against-top-30-ahead-of-shanghai-masters/

Australia and betting go hand in hand, and sports gambling is no exclusion.
Australian gamblers can bet both with some of the bookmakers at bookmakers and online. Whether or not you want to make a sports bet on some other sporting event that is large, Melbourne Cup, or the National Rugby League there are Internet.
Betting is a massive portion of their Oz bet culture, with Australians one of the gamblers in the world. It is a favorite pastime In Australia, sports is not the form of wagering in the nation. The revenue made gambling has more than tripled, so that will tell you something.
For July 2019, our top rated Aussie gambling site is Unibet.
Every sport betting site we review ensured to have and is inspected closely:
Games and leagues in both Australia and overseas to wager on
Sports betting from your smartphone or tablet Payment and withdrawal Choices

Read more here: http://cjcmedia.com/?p=2216

Betting and australia go together, and internet sports gambling is no exclusion.
Australian players can bet equally with any one of the Australian bookmakers in bookmakers and online. Whether you want to create a sports bet on Melbourne Cup the National Rugby League, or even any large sporting event there are Internet.
Betting is a portion of their Oz bet culture, with Australians easily among the gamblers on the planet. While sports isn’t the kind of wagering in the country, it is a favorite pastime. The earnings made by sports betting has more than tripled, so that should tell you something.
For July 2019, our best rated Aussie gaming site is Unibet.
Every sports gambling site we examine guaranteed to possess and is inspected:
Games and championships in both Australia and abroad to bet on
Sports betting from tablet or the smartphone Aussie-friendly payment and withdrawal Choices

Read more here: http://cjcmedia.com/?p=2216

Gambling and australia go hand in hand, and sports gambling is no exception.
Australian gamblers can bet on sports equally with any one of the top Australian bookmakers. Whether or not you want to create a sports bet on some other large sporting event, Melbourne Cup, or the National Rugby League there are many Internet betting choices available to Aussies.
Betting is a portion of their Oz bet civilization, with Australians readily one of the keenest gamblers in the world. While sports is not wagering from the country’s most popular kind, it’s a popular pastime. The earnings generated by sports gambling has more than tripled, so that should tell you something.
For July 2019, our best rated Aussie gambling site is Unibet.
Every sports gambling site we review is scrutinized closely and guaranteed to have:
Games and championships in both Australia and abroad to bet on
Sports betting from your smartphone or tablet Aussie-friendly payment and withdrawal Choices

Read more here: http://cjcmedia.com/?p=2216

Australia and gambling go hand in hand, and sports gambling is no exception.
Australian players can bet both in locally-regulated bookmakers and online with some of the Australian bookmakers. Whether you would like to create a sports bet on any sporting event that is large, Melbourne Cup, or even the National Rugby League somewhere else in the world, there are Internet.
With Australians readily one of the gamblers on the planet, Betting is a portion of the Oz bet civilization. In Australia, sports gambling on the internet is not the most popular form of wagering from the country, it’s a popular pastime. Over the past decade, the earnings generated betting has more than tripled, so that will tell you something.
For July 2019, our top rated Aussie gaming site is Unibet.
Every sport betting online site we review is inspected closely and ensured to have:
Games and championships in both Australia and overseas to bet on
Sports betting from tablet computer or the smartphone Payment and withdrawal options

Read more here: http://cjcmedia.com/?p=2216